Skip Navigation Links.
Activity Information
Presentation
Risk Factors
Diagnostic Evaluation
Test Results
Surgery Results
Adjuvant Therapy
Next Steps
Therapeutic Options
Follow-up
Summary and Discussion
Supplemental Reading
References
Finish

Online CME Activity

A 65-Year-Old Woman Presents With Painless Jaundice


NOTE: Although this activity is no longer certified for credit, we believe that it contains important information and hope you’ll review, print or email it to a colleague.

Title:
A 65-Year-Old Woman Presents With Painless Jaundice
Release Date:
05/20/2009
Expiration Date:
05/20/2010
Topics:
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Primary Audience:
Oncologists
Activity Format:
Patient Case Study
Credits:
2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™

 
Overall Satisfaction Rating:
Full Star Full Star Full Star Full Star Empty Star 80%

Learning Objectives

1) Discuss the work-up for a patient with a newly diagnosed pancreatic mass and the treatment options for localized pancreatic cancer, including the data for surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

2) Discuss the evidence supporting different treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Accreditation

This educational program is conceived and credited in accordance with ACCME’s Essential Areas and Policies, including the 2004 Updated Standards for Commercial Support. Pri-Med faculty hail from a variety of institutions and participate in content development, along with Pri-Med Institute’s Advisory Boards and its expert review partners, the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and Tufts Health Care Institute. All final decisions about program content are the responsibility of Pri-Med Institute.

Credits Type Accreditation Statement Designation Statement
2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ Pri-Med Institute is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Pri-Med Institute designates this educational activity for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Faculty and Editorial Board

Written By: Brian M. Wolpin, MD, MPH, Instructor in Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Edited By: Mary Fitzgerald, MS, RN

Financial Disclosure Statement(s)

Dr Wolpin has no financial relationships to disclose.

The content collaborators at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have no financial relationships to disclose.

Ms Fitzgerald has no financial relationships to disclose.

Education Partner:

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Commercial Support:

Genentech BioOncology and OSI Oncology, sanofi-aventis, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb & ImClone Systems, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company

Instructions for Obtaining Credit:

Complete this activity. Answer the questions in the attached posttest and evaluation. Click on "claim credit" and follow the instructions to print out the credit certificate.

Computer System Requirements:

Internet Explorer (version 5.5 and above) is the recommended browser for Pri-Med Online eCME activities. Your Internet settings should be set to accept cookies and JavaScript. If cookies and/or JavaScript are disabled, the site may not function properly. A minimum screen resolution setting of 800 x 600 is recommended. A high-speed Internet connection (DSL, cable modem, or LAN-based) is not required; however, it is recommended for faster download times.

Disclaimer

The opinions, ideas, and recommendations expressed in this educational activity are those of the faculty only and are not necessarily endorsed, nor do they necessarily reflect, those of their affiliated institutions, Pri-Med Institute, Pri-Med Institute Advisory Boards and Consultants, M|C Communications, LLC, or the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Clinical judgment must guide each clinician in weighing the possible risks, benefits, or contraindications of any diagnostics, interventions or treatments discussed. Clinicians should review manufacturers’ product information and consider these with the recommendations of other authorities when applying the assessment and/or clinical management strategies discussed in this activity to the care of their patients.